USPTO serial 76487532
THE WORLD PEACE PROGRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3337488Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 13, 2007
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE WORLD PEACE PROGRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hollywood, FL
Hollywood, FL
Hollywood, FL
Hollywood, FL
HOLLYWOOD, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Charitable fund raising services, namely, providing funding for economic efforts to support world peace through a variety of financial vehicles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 16, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bransburg, William
- Other trademarks owned by Bransburg, William
- Other trademarks owned by Goldmeer, Constance
- Other trademarks owned by Goldmeer, Constance
- Other trademarks owned by HERRERA, ORLANDO A.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named THE WORLD PEACE PROGRAM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 13, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |