USPTO serial 76487841
DI-CORDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 13, 2004
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DI-CORDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Melbourne, FL
Melbourne, FL
Melbourne, FL
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.
EINDHOVEN, NL
Other trademarks owned by KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward Blocker, Edward W. Goodman, Robert J. Kraus, David L. Barnes, Michael E. Marion, Jack E. Haken
Edward Blocker PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATIONP.O. Box 3001Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510-8001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for converting analog video output to DICOM connectivity, and with the full disclosure capability, capturing and outputting the entire patient encounter to DVD quality video, complete with sound High resolutions files that can be played on any third party high speed media player, for use in the medical field | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 27, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Witt Biomedical Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Witt Biomedical Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Witt Biomedical Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DI-CORDER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |