Drawing for BNX

USPTO serial 76487941

BNX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BNX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tracy-Gene G. Durkin, Esq.

TRACY-GENE G DURKIN ESQ STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX PLLC1100 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3934UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer application software and manuals, namely, personal authentication computer software and single sign-on computer software for integrating personal authentication hardware and software into a computer system or an application running on a computer systemACTIVE—
042Integration of personal authentication software and single sign-on computer software with personal authentication hardware into a computer system or an application running on a computer system; designing and monitoring personal authentication software and hardware, namely, personal authentication computer software, single sign-on computer software and personal authentication hardware for a computer system or an application running on a computer system; Installation, maintenance and support of personal authentication software for a computer system or an application running on a computer systemACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 15, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 15, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 21, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 1, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 13, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 8, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 5, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance