USPTO serial 76488080
XAPPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3018952Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 29, 2005
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with XAPPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
69190 Walldorf, DE
69190 Walldorf, DE
69190 Walldorf, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura Genovese Miller
LAURA GENOVESE MILLER AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLPONE COMMERCE SQ STE 2200PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Packaged composite applications software, as for use in software application integration; software for application and database integration; application development software; graphical user interface software; composite software that invokes and modifies or integrates other software applications and components | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2005 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |