USPTO serial 76488362
BLEST ARE WE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLEST ARE WE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nashville, TN
Nashville, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott J. Major, Esq.
RICHARD TODD HUNTER LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD TODD HUNTER ESQPO BOX 337SAGAPONACK, NY 11962UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded materials, namely, musical sound recordings, and compact disks and videocassettes featuring music and religious, spiritual and motivational content | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The trustee of International Liturgy Publications, a Maryland Not-for-profit Charitable Trust, the sole trustee comprising of Vince Ambrosetti, a U.S. citizen
- Other trademarks owned by The trustee of International Liturgy Publications, a Maryland Not-for-profit Charitable Trust, the sole trustee comprising of Vince Ambrosetti, a U.S. citizen
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named BLEST ARE WE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |