Drawing for BLEST ARE WE

USPTO serial 76488363

BLEST ARE WE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLEST ARE WE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott J. Major, Esq.

SCOTT J MAJOR ESQ MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN, PC2200 CLARENDON BLVDSTE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting the concerts of others with religious, spiritual, and motivational themesABANDONEDAug 23, 1992
041Booking concerts with religious, spiritual, and motivational themes; religious, spiritual, motivational and entertainment services, namely, religious instructional services and organizing community events of ritual, prayer, song and worship, providing motivational and educational speakers on religious, spiritual and motivational topics; organizing, planning and conducting religious workshops, seminars and live music concerts, and the distribution of printed materials in connection therewith; and live performances by a musical artistABANDONEDAug 23, 1992
045Ministerial servicesABANDONEDAug 23, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 2004ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 26, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 6, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 25, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 20, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 19, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 3, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance