USPTO serial 76488688
AEGIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 12, 2007
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with AEGIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Milwaukee, WI, US
Milwaukee, WI, US
Milwaukee, WI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel E. Kattman, Esq.
Daniel E. Kattman, Esq. Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren s.c.1000 N. Water StreetSuite 1900Milwaukee, WI 53202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | [ insect traps, namely, insect monitoring traps sold to professional pest-control operators; ] rat and mouse bait stations sold to professional pest-control operators | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 29, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 29, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 19, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |