Drawing for TELECOM SIMPLIFIED

USPTO serial 76488925

TELECOM SIMPLIFIED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TELECOM SIMPLIFIED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

E. Thomas Watson

E THOMAS WATSON PARKER POE ADAMS & BERNSTEIN LLP401 S TRYON ST STE 3000CHARLOTTE, NC 28202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING FRAME RELAY CONNECTIVITY SERVICES FOR DATA TRANSFER; LOCAL, LONG DISTANCE AND INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; ISDN SERVICES, DSL SERVICES; AND ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVEApr 30, 2002
042CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONSACTIVEApr 30, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 5, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 12, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 8, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 18, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 27, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 29, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance