USPTO serial 76489034
SPILL GUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPILL GUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Epstein
ROBERT L EPSTEIN EPSTEIN DRANGEL BAZERMAN & JAMES LLP60 E 42ND ST RM 820NEW YORK, NY 10165-0820UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Tablecloths not of paper | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |