Drawing for FEED THE TEAM 12-SACK 12 BAGS TO GO!

USPTO serial 76489143

FEED THE TEAM 12-SACK 12 BAGS TO GO!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FEED THE TEAM 12-SACK 12 BAGS TO GO!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kelly Mahon Tullier

KELLY MAHON TULLIER MAIL DROP 3A-420C/O FRITO-LAY INC7701 LEGACY DRPIANO, TX 75024-4099

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029POTATO-BASED SNACKS, NAMELY, POTATO CHIPS, POTATO CRISPS AND PUFFED POTATO SNACKSACTIVE—
030CORN CHIPS; PRETZELSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 23, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 23, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 18, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 9, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 9, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 16, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 28, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 28, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 9, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 18, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 18, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 2, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 29, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance