Drawing for POLYPILL

USPTO serial 76489257

POLYPILL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POLYPILL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryce J. Maynard

Bryce J. Maynard Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PCPOST OFFICE BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations used in the prevention and/or treatment of cardiovascular diseaseACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 17, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 18, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 18, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 18, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 27, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 9, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 22, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 17, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 16, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 15, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 12, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 6, 2004CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 16, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 20, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 16, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance