USPTO serial 76489282
JANICHEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JANICHEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stefan V. Stein
STEFAN V STEIN HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLPSTE 4100100 N TAMPA STTAMPA, FL 33602-3644Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cleaners namely dishwasher detergents, multi-surface cleaners, citrus cleaners, laundry detergents, bleaches and softeners, automatic dishwasher detergents and rinse agents, bathroom and toilet bowl cleaners, soaps namely, anti-bacterial, bar and liquid, car wash detergents, oven cleaners, carpet care products namely, shampoos, spot removers and foamers, wood care products namely, cleaners, maintainers and finishes, floor cleaning products namely, strippers, buffers and finishers | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | cleaning equipment namely, push brooms, deck brushes, bowl brushes, scrub brushes, squeegees and spray bottles | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |