Drawing for WOODSOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 76489415

WOODSOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WOODSOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Todd S. Sharinn

TODD S SHARINN GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP885 3RD AVE 21ST FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008HAND TOOLS, NAMELY HAND SAWS, SCISSORS, CHISELS, BLADES, SANDING BLOCKS AND WOOD KNIVES FOR INSTALLING, SHAPING, CUTTING, POLISHING, SANDING, REFINISHING AND REPAIRING WOOD FLOORS, CEILINGS AND WALLS, AND HAND TOOL PROJECT KITS, NAMELY, PROJECT KITS AND PACKAGES CONTAINING AN ASSORTMENT OF PRODUCTS FOR INSTALLING, SHAPING, CUTTING, POLISHING, SANDING, REFINISHING AND REPAIRING WOOD FLOORS, CEILINGS AND WALLS, NAMELY TOOLS, CLEANING MATERIALS, WOOD STRIPS, WOOD TILES, CAULKS AND GROUTS, ADHESIVES, HARDWARE AND WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS, THE FOREGOING SOLD AS A UNITABANDONED—
017ADHESIVES, NAMELY, CAULK AND GROUT FOR INSTALLING, REFINISHING AND REPAIRING WOOD FLOORS, CEILINGS AND WALLSABANDONED—
019WOOD FLOORING, CEILING AND WALL PRODUCTS, NAMELY, WOOD STRIPS AND WOOD TILESABANDONED—
021CLEANING MATERIALS FOR WOOD FLOORS, CEILINGS AND WALLS, NAMELY, CLEANING TOWELS AND RAGS, CLEANING TOWELS AND RAGS TREATED WITH CLEANING SOLUTIONS, BRUSHES, BROOMS AND MOPSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 1, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 1, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 14, 2006OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 29, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 7, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 24, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 31, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 27, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 19, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance