USPTO serial 76489415
WOODSOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WOODSOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd S. Sharinn
TODD S SHARINN GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP885 3RD AVE 21ST FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | HAND TOOLS, NAMELY HAND SAWS, SCISSORS, CHISELS, BLADES, SANDING BLOCKS AND WOOD KNIVES FOR INSTALLING, SHAPING, CUTTING, POLISHING, SANDING, REFINISHING AND REPAIRING WOOD FLOORS, CEILINGS AND WALLS, AND HAND TOOL PROJECT KITS, NAMELY, PROJECT KITS AND PACKAGES CONTAINING AN ASSORTMENT OF PRODUCTS FOR INSTALLING, SHAPING, CUTTING, POLISHING, SANDING, REFINISHING AND REPAIRING WOOD FLOORS, CEILINGS AND WALLS, NAMELY TOOLS, CLEANING MATERIALS, WOOD STRIPS, WOOD TILES, CAULKS AND GROUTS, ADHESIVES, HARDWARE AND WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS, THE FOREGOING SOLD AS A UNIT | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | ADHESIVES, NAMELY, CAULK AND GROUT FOR INSTALLING, REFINISHING AND REPAIRING WOOD FLOORS, CEILINGS AND WALLS | ABANDONED | — |
| 019 | WOOD FLOORING, CEILING AND WALL PRODUCTS, NAMELY, WOOD STRIPS AND WOOD TILES | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | CLEANING MATERIALS FOR WOOD FLOORS, CEILINGS AND WALLS, NAMELY, CLEANING TOWELS AND RAGS, CLEANING TOWELS AND RAGS TREATED WITH CLEANING SOLUTIONS, BRUSHES, BROOMS AND MOPS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Q.E.P. Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Q.E.P. Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named WOODSOLUTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |