Drawing for VITA SANA

USPTO serial 76489707

VITA SANA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VITA SANA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. Stephen Georgas

M STEPHEN GEORGAS MILLER THOMSON LLP2500-20 QUEEN ST WBOX 27TORONTO, ON M5H 3S1

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029vegetables and legumes preserved in brine; preserved fruit, marmalade, and jam made of fruit; olive oil; salad oil; tinned tomatoes; tomato pureeACTIVE—
030coffee; vinegar; gravies; tomato sauces and alfredo sauces for pasta and dough; edible pasta and dough for human consumption produced with wheat flour or whole wheat; bread; crackers; bread sticks; toasted biscuits; cakes; fancy cakes; confectionery, namely, candies; sea salt; and seasonings, namely, processed herbs and spices for pasta and dough; entrees consisting primarily of prepared pastaACTIVE—
032bottled waterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 29, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 6, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2008UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 16, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 28, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 28, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 12, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 3, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 20, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 20, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 30, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 8, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 3, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 28, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 27, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 17, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 30, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2003AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
May 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance