USPTO serial 76489879
GOODNITE SLEEPTIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOODNITE SLEEPTIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
City of Commerce, CA
City of Commerce, CA
City of Commerce, CA
City of Commerce, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Berliner
ROBERT BERLINER FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP865 S FIGUEROA ST STE 2900LOS ANGELES, CA 90017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, overalls, pants, shorts, shirts, T-shirts, vests, hats, dresses, bloomers, panties, headbands, and shoes; clothing, namely, socks and pajamas | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Smith, R. Leland B., Jr.
- Other trademarks owned by Smith, R. Leland B., Jr.
- Other trademarks owned by Murphy, Erin L.
- Other trademarks owned by Murphy, Erin L.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named GOODNITE SLEEPTIGHT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 19, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |