Drawing for PERFECTLY ROOTEIN

USPTO serial 76490860

PERFECTLY ROOTEIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFECTLY ROOTEIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan A. Richards, Esq.

SUSAN A RICHARDS ESQ MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, PC1751 PINNACLE DRSTE 500MCLEAN, VA 22102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Lawn and garden products and landscaping and horticulture products, homecare horticultural products, namely, soil conditioners, soil supplements, chemical compost accelerators, organic compost accelerators, fertilizers for agricultural or domestic use, mineral-based water cleansers, ph supplements for soil, and soil amendmentsACTIVE—
005Herbicides and weed killers for agricultural or domestic useACTIVE—
044Lawn and garden care, horticultural and landscape gardening servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 1, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 18, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance