Drawing for CEOS WALK THE WALK

USPTO serial 76490897

CEOS WALK THE WALK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CEOS WALK THE WALK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory W. Carr

Gregory W. Carr Carr LLP900 Jackson Street, Suite 670Dallas, TX 75202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Charitable fundraising through organizing and conducting group activities, namely participation in a group walkACTIVEMar 3, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 13, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 13, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 13, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 23, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 6, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 6, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 21, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 18, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 18, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Nov 18, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 3, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 22, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 9, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance