USPTO serial 76491270
TOWNOPOLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOWNOPOLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Farmington Hills, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arnold S. Weintraub
ARNOLD S WEINTRAUB THE WEINTRAUB GROUP PLC32000 NORTHWESTERN HWY STE 240FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48334UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Custom printing of game boards and accessories therefor | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |