Drawing for E45

USPTO serial 76491353

E45

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E45?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony L. Rahhal

ANTHONY L RAHHAL MCAFEE & TAFTTENTH FL TWO LEADERSHIP SQ211 N ROBINSONOKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Submersible motors for use with submersible pumpsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 21, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 21, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 21, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 28, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 20, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 22, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 3, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 23, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 30, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 30, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance