USPTO serial 76491443
MR. QUARTERBACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MR. QUARTERBACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Southborough, MA
Southborough, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph E. Funk
JOSEPH E FUNKPO BOX 66182 CHASE ROADLONDONDERRY, NH 30530661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Football passing machine for sports practice | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2004 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |