Drawing for COMFORTSOFTWEAR

USPTO serial 76491463

COMFORTSOFTWEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMFORTSOFTWEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHELLE A. MASSICOTTE

MICHELLE A MASSICOTTE NIXON PEABODY LLP101 FEDERAL STBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Label processing machines, namely machines for manufacturing labelsACTIVE—
024labels, namely fabric labels and printed textile labels, sold only to clothing and/or soft goods manufacturers and not directly to the publicACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Nov 15, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 17, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 7, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 7, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 30, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 29, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 23, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance