USPTO serial 76491815
MELT LONDON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2007
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MELT LONDON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London ECIV 2QQ, GB
London ECIV 2QQ, GB
London ECIV 2QQ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas P. Liniak
MATTHEW STAVISH BERENATO, WHITE & STAVISH6550 ROCK SPRING DR STE 240BETHESDA, MD 20817UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | WOMEN'S FASHION CLOTHING, NAMELY, BLOUSES, SKIRTS AND PANTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Blue Clothing Company Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Blue Clothing Company Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Blue Clothing Company Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named MELT LONDON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 10, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2004 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |