USPTO serial 76491840
DITO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DITO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SE-105 45 STOCKHOLM, SE
23200 AUBUSSON, FR
23200 AUBUSSON, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael W. Garvey
MICHAEL W GARVEY PEARNE & GORDON LLP1801 E 9TH ST STE 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power-operated cooking and food preparation equipment for commercial use, namely, electric food processors, beaters and mixers, electric vegetable and fruit peelers, electric food cutters, slicers, grinders and juicers, electric vegetable dehydrators, vacuum packaging machines; commercial equipment for washing, namely dishwashing machines, rack and tray conveyors; garbage disposals; trash compactors; and parts and attachments for all of the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Hand-operated kitchen tools and instruments, namely, blades for hand operated food processors, hand-operated food choppers, cutters, graters, peelers, slicers, scrapers, dicers, corers, shredders, wedgers and attachments therefore | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Commercial food services equipment for heating, steaming, cooking, and refrigerating food, namely, cooking ovens, gas grills, electric grills, electric hotplates, gas ranges, electric ranges, electric deep fryers, electric infrared and induction food warmers, electric pasta cookers, electric cabinets used to control temperature and humidity for heating and thawing foods, electric food steamers, gas and electric cooktops, electric fry pans, bratt pans, blast chillers, blast freezers, refrigerators; refrigerators, namely, cold rooms, refrigerated counters and refrigerated tables, ice makers, refrigerated and heated food display cases, water softening units, ozone sanitizers for air and water; water sanitizers not for medical use; cookware, namely, gas or electric bain maries; and parts for all of the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AKTIEBOLAGET ELECTROLUX
- Other trademarks owned by DITO-SAMA
- Other trademarks owned by DITO-SAMA
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named DITO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 23, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |