USPTO serial 76491865
BUCKINGHAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUCKINGHAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Masonite International Corporation
Mississauga, Ontario L4W 1J2, CA
Other trademarks owned by Masonite International Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph W. Berenato, III
JOSEPH W BERENATO III LINIAK, BERENATO & WHITE, LLC6550 ROCK SPG DR STE 240BETHESDA, MD 20817UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | ENTRY DOORS NOT MADE OF METAL AND DOOR FACINGS FOR ENTRY DOORS NOT MADE OF METAL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |