USPTO serial 76492226
KING INNOVATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 29, 2005
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KING INNOVATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
King Technology of Missouri, Inc.
St. Charles, MO
King Technology of Missouri, Inc.
St. Charles, MO
King Technology of Missouri, Inc.
St. Charles, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carl L. Johnson
CARL L JOHNSON JACOBSON AND JOHNSONSTE 285ONE W WATER STSAINT PAUL, MN 55107-2080Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICAL WIRE CONNECTORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 10, 2002 |
| 011 | POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PLUMBING FITTINGS FOR UNDERGROUND WATER SYSTEMS, NAMELY, DRAIN VALVES, ELBOWS, TEES, NIPPLES, VALVE PROTECTORS, AND COUPLINGS; AND DRAIN REPAIR KITS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF POLYVINYL CHLORIDE COUPLINGS FOR ATTACHING PIPES TOGETHER, PIPE PULLING GRIPS, AND PIPE CUTTERS SOLD AS A UNIT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 10, 2002 |
| 017 | NON-METAL PIPE COUPLINGS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 10, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by King Technology of Missouri, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by King Technology of Missouri, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by King Technology of Missouri, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named KING INNOVATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |