USPTO serial 76492446
STUTZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STUTZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUME, COLOGNE,PERFUMERY | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Oct 10, 1992 |
| 009 | SUNGLASSES | ACTIVE | Oct 10, 1992 |
| 014 | BASED ON USE-- WATCHES BASED ON INTENT-- JEWELRY | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Oct 10, 1992 |
| 018 | LEATHER BAGS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Oct 10, 1992 |
| 025 | CLOTHES - MEN'S WEAR AND WOMEN'S WEAR NAMELY SUITS, T-SHIRTS, PANTS, SWEATERS, SPORT COATS, CASUAL COATS, OVERCOATS, CASUAL SHIRTS, DRESS SHIRTS, TIES, SCARVES, MEN'S FOOTWEAR, WOMEN'S FOOTWEAR, TUXEDOS, SOCKS, SHORTS AND SWIM SUITS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Oct 10, 1992 |
| 032 | BEER | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Oct 10, 1992 |
| 033 | ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES NAMELY WINE, SCOTCH, VODKA, GIN, VERMOUTH, TEQUILA, RUM, COGNAC, BRANDY, WHISKEY | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Oct 10, 1992 |
| 034 | CIGARS, TOBACCO | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STUTZ MOTOR CAR OF AMERICA, INC. WARRE LIU DIRECTOR
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Similar marks named STUTZ
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |