Drawing for CHILD GUARD

USPTO serial 76492650

CHILD GUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBBINS, ODESSA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CHILD GUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel Kirshner

199 RT 18 SE BRUNSWICK, NJ 08816-1413UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic battery-operated transmitters for monitoring childrenACTIVEApr 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2004MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Oct 13, 2004ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Oct 13, 2004CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 13, 2004REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 3, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 28, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 26, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 27, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2003CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 18, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance