Drawing for GRANDSTAND ENTERTAINMENT

USPTO serial 76493109

GRANDSTAND ENTERTAINMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRANDSTAND ENTERTAINMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph L. Serling

JOSEPH L SERLING SERLING ROOKS & FERRARA, LLP254 W 54TH ST 14TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded audio discs, tapes and phonogragh records featuring music and entertainment, prerecorded video discs and tapes featuring music and entertainment, and providing downloadable audio and video recordings featuring music and entertainment via a global computer networkACTIVE—
016Posters and stickersACTIVE—
025Clothing; namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, polo shirts, sport shirts, jackets, caps, and jerseysACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, production of video and audio recordings featuring music and entertainment; music production services for others in the nature of releasing video and audio recordings featuring music and entertainment and providing prerecorded music and video online via a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 21, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 17, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 13, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 30, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 19, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 26, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance