USPTO serial 76493167
THE BEAUTY BUFFET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE BEAUTY BUFFET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHERINE A. MILLS
KATHERINE A MILLS NEFF MILLS PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION9107 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 600BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADVERTISING AND MARKETING SERVICES INCLUDING PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT OF PROMOTIONAL EVENTS COMMUNICATING TO THE PUBLIC WITH THE OBJECT OF PRESENTING ALL KINDS OF GOODS AND SERVICES THROUGH DISTRIBUTION OF MEDIA INFORMATION AND SAMPLES AND ALL MEANS OF DIFFUSION AND CONCERNING ALL KINDS OF GOODS OR SERVICES BRINGING TOGETHER, FOR THE BENEFIT OF OTHERS, A VARIETY OF GOODS AND SERVICES, (EXCLUDING THE TRANSPORT THEREOF) TO ASSIST SELLERS OF GOODS AND SERVICES IN ADVERTISING THEIR GOODS AND SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |