Drawing for PARADISE LAVOSH

USPTO serial 76493247

PARADISE LAVOSH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARADISE LAVOSH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Wray

JAMES C WRAY LAW OFFICES OF JAMES C. WRAY1493 CHAIN BRG RD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Baked cracker bread and baked Armenian breadACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 25, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 25, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 5, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 1, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 12, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 19, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 12, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 28, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2003CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance