USPTO serial 76493247
PARADISE LAVOSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PARADISE LAVOSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Wray
JAMES C WRAY LAW OFFICES OF JAMES C. WRAY1493 CHAIN BRG RD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Baked cracker bread and baked Armenian bread | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 25, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 25, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |