Drawing for IPLEX

USPTO serial 76493265

IPLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IPLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew D. Price

JOEL N BOCK ESQ SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLPWACKER DR STATION SEARS TWRP O BOX 061080CHICAGO, IL 60606-1080

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and downloadable computer software that allows users to perform business negotiations and transactions regarding the shipment of goods via the Internet; computer software and downloadable computer software for obtaining tracking and tracing information and performing data analysis and transactions regarding shipments of goods in transit, in the field of supply chain managementACTIVE—
035Operating on-line marketplaces for sellers of shipping services by which parties seeking or providing shipping services can locate one another and come together via the Internet, telephone, fax, in person, or any other means of communications to transact business; and business management services, namely, managing logistics, reverse logistics, supply chain services, supply chain visibility and synchronization, supply and demand forecasting and product distribution processes for othersACTIVE—
039Providing an online computer database that provides logistical information on the shipping industry in the field of obtaining tracking and tracing information, performing data analysis and transactions regarding shipments of goods in transit, in the field of supply chain managementACTIVE—
042Customization of computer software for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 31, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 11, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 25, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance