Drawing for EXTREME ENABLED

USPTO serial 76493744

EXTREME ENABLED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXTREME ENABLED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Margaret M. Powers, Esq.

ALLYN TAYLOR GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP2000 UNIVERSITY AVEEAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303-2248UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware, namely, network switches with embedded software for network management and control and related network equipment, namely, power supplies and link extenders; computer hardware, computer software, and integrated circuits, for network management and high-speed networking, routing and switching; computer hardware and embedded software that perform the high-speed switching and routing of data, voice and video communications across service provider, web content provider and enterprise network infrastructures; network management software for managing and monitoring network nodes, network devices and network systems, namely, capabilities for network configuration, troubleshooting and status monitoring; computer software that guides Internet traffic to the optimal location; and user manuals sold therewith as a unitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 8, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance