USPTO serial 76493770
WATERFALL BANQUET & CONFERENCE CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3534403Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 18, 2008
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WATERFALL BANQUET & CONFERENCE CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Claymont, DE
Claymont, DE
Claymont, DE
Claymont, DE
Claymont, DE
Claymont, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIMOTHY D. PECSENYE
TIMOTHY D. PECSENYE BLANK ROME LLPONE LOGAN SQUARE9th FloorPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Providing banquet and social function facilities for special occasions; catering services; restaurant services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Scotto, Vincenzo
- Other trademarks owned by Scotto, Vincenzo
- Other trademarks owned by Scotto, Vincenzo
- Other trademarks owned by Scotto, Biagio
- Other trademarks owned by Scotto, Biagio
- Other trademarks owned by Scotto, Biagio
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named WATERFALL BANQUET & CONFERENCE CENTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |