USPTO serial 76493819
HTRAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HTRAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Prahran Victoria 3181, AU
Prahran Victoria 3181, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Grace
David W. Grace Loeb & Loeb LLP10100 Santa Monica BoulevardSuite 2200Los Angeles, CA 90067-4120Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer software for use by the health care industry in database management, patient procedure costing and supply chain management, namely, for use by doctors and nurses on the hospital floor for monitoring the use of pharmaceutical products within hospitals, linking such usage to patients, and efficiently reordering stock that has been consumed | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software and hardware design for the health care industry; design and implementation of IT solutions for the health care industry, namely, database designs, patient procedure costing and supply chain management; computer services for the health care industry, namely, database designs, patient procedure costing and supply chain management; computer hardware and software consultation for the health care industry all of the above directed towards doctors and nurses on the hospital floor for monitoring the use of pharmaceutical products within hospitals, linking such usage to patients, and efficiently reordering stock that has been consumed | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |