USPTO serial 76493920
VAN HELSING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VAN HELSING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne B. Nielsen
Anne B. Nielsen UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS LLLP100 UNIVERSAL CITY PLAZAUNIVERSAL CITY, CA 91608UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOYS AND GAMES, NAMELY ACTION FIGURES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; BALLOONS; BATHTUB TOYS; TOY BUILDING BLOCKS; DOLLS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; DOLL CLOTHING; BOARD GAMES, CARD GAMES; PLAY COSMETICS FOR CHILDREN; COSTUME MASKS; MINIATURE DIE CAST VEHICLES; TOY AIRPLANES AND HELICOPTERS; BATTERY OPERATED REMOTE CONTROLLED TOY VEHICLES; FLYING DISCS; INFLATABLE VINYL FIGURES; JIGSAW PUZZLES; KITES; MARBLES; PLAYING CARDS; INDOOR SLUMBER AND PLAY TENTS; PLUSH TOYS; HAND HELD PUPPETS; SIT-IN AND RIDE-ON TOY VEHICLES; TRAIN SETS; PLAY SHAVING KITS; SKATEBOARDS; ROLLER SKATES; TOY BANKS; WATER SQUIRTING TOYS; TOY PISTOLS; TARGET SETS; CHRISTMAS TREE ORNAMENTS; PINBALL AND ARCADE GAME MACHINES AND HAND HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |