Drawing for GRAVITYCOREWORK

USPTO serial 76494121

GRAVITYCOREWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRAVITYCOREWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN C BEUERLE

STEPHEN C BEUERLE PROCOPIO CORY HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP530 B ST STE 2100SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4469UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041EXERCISE SERVICES, NAMELY, PERSONAL TRAINER SERVICES, PHYSICAL FITNESS CONSULTATION, PHYSICAL FITNESS INSTRUCTION, PHYSICAL FITNESS TRAINING, EXERCISE TRAINING SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 3, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 3, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 12, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 12, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 18, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jan 14, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 16, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 2003CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance