USPTO serial 76494125
THE BEARDED CLAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE BEARDED CLAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kitty Hawk, NC
Kitty Hawk, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald C. Casey, Esq.
DONALD C CASEY ESQ311 N WASHINGTON STSTE 100ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | RESTAURANT SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 7, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |