USPTO serial 76494264
BOSTON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOSTON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Lawrence Oliverio
M. Lawrence Oliverio Rissman Jobse Hendricks & Oliverio LLP100 Cambridge StreetSuite 2101Boston, MA 02114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Resilient and rigid rubber and/or plastic covered aluminum, rubber and plastic bumper guards for protecting walls and the like in the nature of door stops of rubber | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | Tables, cabinets shelves, desks, storage and display rack; point of purchase displays in the nature of merchandise hoppers; frame systems in the nature of display racks comprising grids used to display merchandise, define space and to hand lighting and signs; resilient and rigid rubber and/or plastic covered aluminum, rubber and plastic bumper guards for protecting walls and the like in the nature of bumper guards for furniture and plastic door stops | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |