USPTO serial 76494271
VIPER MOTORCYCLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PILARO, MARK F
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIPER MOTORCYCLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LINDA K HOPKINS
LINDA K HOPKINS INTELLIWARE INTERNATIONAL LAW FIRM449 S OWASSO BLVD.ROSEVILLE, MN 55113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | MOTORCYCLES AND STRUCTURAL PARTS FOR MOTORCYCLES; MOTORCYCLE PARTS, NAMELY, BRAKE CABLES, CLUTCH CABLE, FORK BEARING AND RACES, FORK DUST BOOTS, FORK SEALS, HANDLE BARS, HANDLE BAR CONTROL LEVERS, HANDLE BAR DAMPERS, HANDLE BAR GRIPS, BRAKE CALIPERS, BRAKE PEDALS, BRAKE ROTORS, FRONT SPACERS, FRONT DASH PANELS, SHIFT LEVERS AND HEADLIGHT MOUNTS; AND MOTORCYCLE ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, MOTORCYCLE KICKSTANDS, MOTORCYCLE SADDLEBAGS AND MOTORCYCLE SIDECARS | ABANDONED | Feb 24, 2003 |
| 025 | (Based on Intent to Use) APPAREL, NAMELY, SWEATSHIRTS, RUGGED SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, JACKETS, HATS, SWEATERS, VESTS, JERSEYS, PULLOVERS, SHIRTS, BANDANAS, COATS, SHELLS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 29, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 29, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |