USPTO serial 76494477
LAWN GIANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAWN GIANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eamon J. Wall
EAMON J WALL MOSER, PATTERSON & SHERIDAN, LLP595 SHREWSBURY AVESTE 100SHREWSBURY, NJ 07702Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Soil amendments, namely, bio-stimulant for turf and ornamental plants, organic fertilizer for domestic use, sulfate of potash for fertilization | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |