USPTO serial 76494541
EISENBERG STEAK N FRANK MADE WITH SIRLOIN AND WORCHESTERSHIRE STEAK SEASONING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 14, 2006
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EISENBERG STEAK N FRANK MADE WITH SIRLOIN AND WORCHESTERSHIRE STEAK SEASONING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kelly Corned Beef Co. of Chicago
Chicago, IL
Kelly Corned Beef Co. of Chicago
Chicago, IL
Kelly Corned Beef Co. of Chicago
Chicago, IL
NORWOOD, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Cramarosso
MICHAEL A CRAMAROSSO LAW OFFICES SHEFSKY & FROELICH LTD444 N MICHIGAN AVECHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Hot dog sandwiches | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 4, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kelly Corned Beef Co. of Chicago
- Other trademarks owned by Kelly Corned Beef Co. of Chicago
- Other trademarks owned by Kelly Corned Beef Co. of Chicago
- Other trademarks owned by HOME MARKET FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named EISENBERG STEAK N FRANK MADE WITH SIRLOIN AND WORCHESTERSHIRE STEAK SEASONING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |