USPTO serial 76494734
ZUMANITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3204265Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 30, 2007
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ZUMANITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, H1Z 4M6, CA
Montreal, Quebec, H1Z 4M6, CA
Montreal, Quebec, H1Z 4M6, CA
THE DREAM MERCHANT COMPANY KFT.
BUDAPEST, HU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Monica Riva Talley
Monica Riva Talley Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.1100 New York Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Fine and costume jewelry, namely, necklaces | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 6, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Creations Meandres Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Creations Meandres Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Creations Meandres Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by THE DREAM MERCHANT COMPANY KFT.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named ZUMANITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2005 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |