USPTO serial 76494818
AQUASONIC WATERJET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AQUASONIC WATERJET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam Sacharoff
ADAM SACHAROFF MUCH SHELIST FREED DENENBERG AMENT191 N WACKER DR STE 1800CHICAGO, IL 60606-1615UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | oral hygiene products namely a device with interchangeable heads sold as a unit that include an oral irrigator, toothbrush with nozzle to release water, and tongue scraper with openings to release water | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |