USPTO serial 76494858
TUGUSTO CHEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TUGUSTO CHEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth H. Oh
KENNETH H OH1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-6304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | food products, namely, food flavorings, bakery goods, processed herbs, spices, seasonings, sauces, mixes for bakery goods, rice and pasta | ACTIVE | May 20, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2005 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2005 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 25, 2005 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |