USPTO serial 76495056
WHOLE KIDS ORGANIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHOLE KIDS ORGANIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher L. Graff
CHRISTOPHER L GRAFF TROP, PRUNER & HU PC1616 S VOSS RD STE 750HOUSTON, TX 77057-2631UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Cookies, pudding, maple syrup, toaster pastries, bread, processed grains, pasta, granola, cereal-based food bars, rice-based food bars, wheat-based food bars, processed popcorn, corn-based chips, pretzels, salad dressing, ketchup, chocolate syrup, chocolate chips, cheese sauce, salsas, pizza, cereal-based snack foods, rice-based snack foods, wheat-based snack foods, whole grain and dry fruit bars, candy, frozen yogurt, frozen fruit bars, frozen boxed dinners consisting primarily of pasta or rice | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |