USPTO serial 76495115
SELECTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SELECTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES R MENKER
JAMES R MENKER PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLPPO BOX 10500MCLEAN, VA 22153UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | DEALERSHIPS IN THE FIELD OF NEW AND USED AUTOMOBILES | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 5, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 5, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |