USPTO serial 76495496
PROFESSIONAILS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3038876Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 2006
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROFESSIONAILS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Job in 't Goor, BE
St. Job in 't Goor, BE
St. Job in 't Goor, BE
AMAZING BRANDS BESLOTEN VENNOOTSCHAP MET BEPERKTE AANSPRAKELIJKHEID
KAPELLEN, BE
Other trademarks owned by AMAZING BRANDS BESLOTEN VENNOOTSCHAP MET BEPERKTE AANSPRAKELIJKHEID
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Kirschstein
DAVID B KIRSCHSTEIN KIRSCHSTEIN OTTINGER ISRAEL & SCHIFFMILL489 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-6105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HANDCARE AND NAILCARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, NAIL TIPS, NAIL POLISHES, NAIL POLISH REMOVERS, NAIL TIP REMOVERS, NAIL OVERLAY ENAMEL GELS, ACRYL LIQUIDS USED AS NAIL HARDENERS, PRIMERS FOR ADHESION OF ACRYL LIQUIDS AND GELS ONTO NAILS, NAIL POLISH THINNERS AND PUMICE STONES FOR PERSONAL USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | MANICURE AND PEDICURE IMPLEMENTS, NAMELY, NAIL FILES, NAIL SCISSORS, NAIL CLIPPERS, CUTICLE SCISSORS, CUTICLE PUSHERS, NAIL CUTTERS, BLADES, NAIL BUFFING BLOCKS AND TWEEZERS; ELECTRIC MANICURE AND PEDICURE SETS CONTAINING AN ELECTRIC MOTOR GRINDER WITH BUILT-IN ASPIRATION USED FOR MANICURE AND PEDICURE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | ULTRAVIOLET LAMPS NOT FOR MEDICAL USE, NAMELY, ULTRAVIOLET LAMPS FOR CURING NAILS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | NAILBRUSHES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS, CONFERENCES AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELDS OF HAND CARE AND NAIL CARE; TRAINING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF HAND CARE AND NAIL CARE; TRAINING SERVICES IN APPLYING, MANICURING AND REMOVING NAIL TIPS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CLAUS, CATHERINE
- Other trademarks owned by CLAUS, CATHERINE
- Other trademarks owned by CLAUS, CATHERINE
- Other trademarks owned by AMAZING BRANDS BESLOTEN VENNOOTSCHAP MET BEPERKTE AANSPRAKELIJKHEID
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named PROFESSIONAILS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |