USPTO serial 76495564
US OPEN PROMINIGOLF TOURNAMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with US OPEN PROMINIGOLF TOURNAMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Myrtle Beach, SC
Myrtle Beach, SC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN D ANDERSON
BRIAN D ANDERSON OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND ET AL1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of miniature golf tournaments | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2006 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |