USPTO serial 76495632
EXPERT GARDENER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXPERT GARDENER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by United Industries Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by SCHULTZ COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by WAL-MART STORES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named EXPERT GARDENER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |