USPTO serial 76495884
MASTERFOODS CUSTOMER INSIGHTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MASTERFOODS CUSTOMER INSIGHTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie K. Mitchell, Esq.
LESLIE K MITCHELL ESQ ARENT FOX PLLC1675 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used in customer management system that is used by a sales force to provide information regarding various products, namely, pet food, confectionery, frozen confectionery, ice cream, energy bars, rice, rice mixes, pasta mixes, sauces, potato side dishes, prepared entrees consisting mainly of meat with vegetables, sauce, cheese and/or starch, soups, salads, pancakes, blintzes, crepes, fajitas, enchiladas, souffles, quiches, paella, panang, prepared desserts, cobblers, parfaits, seasoning, spreads including chocolate and marshmallow spread, spreads consisting of peanut butter, jelly, cheese, salsa and/or fruit, sandwiches, dehydrated meat, dehydrated vegetables, dehydrated seafood, dehydrated chicken, poultry dressing mix, and peanut-pretzel snack | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing business and commercial information in the field of foods, namely, pet food, confectionery, frozen confectionery, ice cream, energy bars, rice, rice mixes, pasta mixes, sauces, potato side dishes, prepared entrees consisting mainly of meat with vegetables, sauce, cheese or starch, soups, salads, pancakes, blintzes, crepes, fajitas, enchiladas, souffles, quiches, paella, panang, prepared desserts, cobblers, parfaits, seasoning, spreads including chocolate and marshmallow spread, spreads consisting of peanut butter, jelly, cheese, salsa or fruit, sandwiches, dehydrated meat, dehydrated vegetable, dehydrated seafood, dehydrated chicken, poultry dressing mix, and peanut-pretzel snack | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely conducting in-person training and training via computer software in the food service and sales fields to provide a sales force with information regarding various products, namely pet food, confectionery, frozen confectionery, ice cream, energy bars, rice, rice mixes, pasta mixes, sauces, potato side dishes, prepared entrees consisting mainly of meat with vegetables, sauce, cheese or starch, soups, salads, pancakes, blintzes, crepes, fajitas, enchiladas, souffles, quiches, paella, panang, prepared desserts, cobblers, parfaits, seasoning, spreads including chocolate and marshmallow spread, spreads consisting of peanut butter, jelly, cheese, salsa or fruit, sandwiches, dehydrated meat, dehydrated vegetables, dehydrated seafood, dehydrated chicken, poultry dressing mix, and peanut-pretzel snack and providing printed materials connected therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mars, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Mars, Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MASTERFOODS CUSTOMER INSIGHTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |